Biomedical ethics examines the moral implications of decisions and actions in the fields of medicine, and healthcare. (Varkey, 2020). It seeks to provide a framework for ethical decision-making in situations where medical interventions, research, or other healthcare practices raise moral questions. The key principles are autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice. Autonomy is the respect for a person’s right to make informed decisions about their health and the care they are to receive. These principles are interconnected and rely on each other to work therefore it is difficult to rank them. For example an individual may want to be done for euthanasia which is illegal. Due to the reasoning that she has autonomy, this may lead her to the belief that it is possible. On the other hand the principle of beneficence encourages us to do good to promote the patient’s well-being part of which include ensuring the patient’s safety. From the above example, it shows that they work together to improve care but all are important and none should be given superiority over the other. Each situation will determine if we need to use all four of them or a particular one. The bottom line is they should all be applied equally to everyone to ensure fairness and avoid harm. “Principles also can come into conflict with each other, which is the most common source of ethical dilemmas in health care.” (Bogue, 2022).
Reference
Bogue, D. W., Jr, M. C., Torre, V. J. D. L., Evans, K. A., Hoehner, P. J., Hogan M., White, N. H. (2022). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care. Grand Canyon University. https://bibliu.com/app/?bibliuMagicToken=EEeDwFqQXKfHsFDmZ9CRjZxvEPgug6FY#/view/books/B1B4SGSSID7LR/epub/Chapter2.html#page_170
Varkey, B. (2020). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119