A worldview that upholds the intrinsic value of human life significantly influences perspectives on bioethical issues such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research. From a perspective that values human life from conception, abortion is often viewed as morally impermissible because it involves the termination of a developing human being. Proponents of this view argue that life begins at conception, and therefore, the fetus has a right to life that should be protected. Conversely, others argue that a woman’s autonomy over her body grants her the right to make decisions regarding pregnancy, emphasizing bodily integrity and reproductive rights.

Regarding designer babies, ethical concerns arise around genetic modifications for non-medical reasons. While genetic interventions can prevent hereditary diseases, the ability to select physical traits or enhance intelligence raises concerns about eugenics and social inequality (Hendricks, 2023). This practice may lead to a societal divide where genetic enhancements become available only to the wealthy, exacerbating existing disparities.

Stem cell research presents a complex ethical dilemma. While it has the potential to cure debilitating diseases, the use of embryonic stem cells involves the destruction of human embryos, which some consider equivalent to taking a life (Anomaly & Johnson, 2023). Ethical perspectives that prioritize human dignity advocate for alternative research methods, such as induced pluripotent stem cells, which do not involve embryo destruction. Ultimately, one’s belief in the sanctity of human life shapes moral judgments on these issues.

References;

Hendricks, P. (2023). The pregnancy rescue case: Why abortion is immoral. Journal of Medical Ethics, 50(5), 332-334. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109107.

Anomaly, J., & Johnson, T. (2023). The ethics of genetic enhancement. The Routledge Handbook of the Ethics of Human Enhancement, 145-153. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003105596- 14.